Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The earliest truly modern human skull was found in Liujiang/China.

Why hasn't Klevius got the Nobel prize for his theory on consciousness/AI?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Homo Naledi - and a late "West" hating lawyer relative. A judge for May?

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Prince Charles accuses islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "Euro populism like the Nazis"

Prince Charles accuses islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "Euro populism like the Nazis"

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

While laughter moves out from BBC, islamization moves in

BBC lies and fake news

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, Obama continues supporting islamofascism

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

Islam was born out of what Human Rights consider evil

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Subaru was a decade before Audi with mass produced 4WD cars! And unlike Audi they were reliable and safer to drive.

Saudi based and steered OIC is a muslim extremist organization

Only SE-Asia offered tropical island/mainland fluctuations for a better packed brain

The islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer of the Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia.

Out of Africa as Koranic slaves

The Arab/islamic slave trade throughout 1400 years is by far the most extensive and disgusting in the history of the world (see e.g. Lal's example from India to better understand how the system worked). However, ask your kids if their teacher has even mentioned it! Guess not, cause that would be "islamophobia", the worst crime in Sharia next after apostasy, i.e. leaving islam (OIC is busy abusing UN for the purpose of criminalizing criticism of islam/Sharia. OIC is even introducing a global Sharia ruled criminal court for the purpose of defending the worst crime ever against humanity). Moreover, islam itself was a product of slave raiding and trading. The Koran was just a later assembled manual for excusing looting, slavery and rapetivism. Don't ask yourself why muslim "extremists" have behaved so badly but rather why islam encourages them to do so. Don't wonder about why muslim majority countries have been so backward and poor (except when they've lived on slavery and oil). Read history and realize that islam is pure parasitism. When did you last time buy a car or a camera etc. produced by an Arab muslim country?

If you have to pray, please do it for yourself - not as collective mob supporting islamofascism!

True islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Origin of the Goths and the Vikings

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Japan's successful return to Earth mission 10 yrs before Europe's failed Rosetta

Origin of islam: One way Sharia slave finance and sex apartheid

The faith problem - rapetivism and Christian/muslim rap cooperation

Two slavs and one ex-muslim hit islam in its groin

Mishal Husain, Samantha Lewthwaite, Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Sharia restricts Human Rights and promotes supremacism (drawing 1979 and photo 2012 by P. Klevius)

The native "Brits" from Doggerland spoke a para-Finnish/Uralic language

Klevius main legacy will be the bias his IQ-powered interdisciplinary research reveals

It's quite common to laugh at presumably biased anthropologists from the past - especially if they were "white". However, a much more interesting and useful task is to search for today's bias. Klevius scientific methodology rests entirely on a relentless pursuit of self-criticism (the only truly scientific approach) which makes Klevius an utterly humble not to say laughable person but his revelations at least honest and hence well suited for targeting bias from moderately intelligent but highly subjective (or bribed) academics. Klevius intellectual heritage (father was Sweden's best chess player, both uncle's were Finland's top CEOs and sister scored highest in IBM's IQ test - also consider EMAH) doesn't hurt either. Moreover, although Bourdieu wasn't especially intelligent (his Masculine Domination is extremely shy, lame and shallow compared to Klevius take on sex segregation) his notes on the scholastic fallacy, Homo academicus and the theory of the theoretical point of view may have some bearing here for those who think it's more fancy to read Bourdieu than Klevius.

We non-muslims need to honor victims of islam and its racism - cause muslims won't

Nation of Islam leader Farra Khan aka Louis Wolcott (friend of Sadiq Khan), spreads murderous hate

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused “man" who spends Western oil money on racist/sexist Sharia

How much suffering has this disgusting "man" Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud caused by spreading islamofascism around the world by the help of Western oil-money the Saudi dictator family has distributed via him?!

Contrast this scumbag against those (incl. Klevius) who relentlessly volunteer for spreading knowledge about Human Rights and are called "islamophobes" simply because islam doesn't submit to Human Rights (this is why the islamofascist organization OIC has openly abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia).

Japanese 1959/1964 (Tokyo MS) high quality v European low quality

Klevius is YOUR unbiased and informed resource!

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation, (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst crime ever) is the most evil expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner as well a OIC and their Human Rights violating Sharia declaration on islamic "human rights".

Don't bother about stupid books, focus instead on OIC's islamofascist sharia manifesto!

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Klevius to all the world's girls on the International Girl's Day: Learn more about heterosexual attraction and Human Rights - and about the problem with sex segregation/apartheid and islamic sharia.


Acknowledgement: Please, don't confuse private religion with mob religion. Although Klevius himself has no understanding of this "private religion", he doesn't bother about it either as long as it's kept private. Klevius' "islamophobia" is only concerned with islam's (e.g. via OIC) violations of the most basic of Human Rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.


When we get rid of religious rapetivism* then other forms of rapetivism will be much easier to challenge - because as it stands now, religious rapetivism can hide behind "freedom of religion".

* 'Rapetivism' is a concept introduced by Klevius in the early 2000.

Klevius sex education for girls. And why aren't girls  (and boys) offered proper sex educationb at school?


Islamic Sharia restricts Human Rights and promotes supremacism (drawing 1979 and photo 2012 by P. Klevius).


Normal heterosexual attraction* (female bodies as possible and potential eroticizers for males) is comparable with being extremely beautiful or ugly. It causes attention. And although it might feel like an extra power, do realize that heterosexual attraction is only in the male eye. 

However, according to the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration - agreed on 1948 after WW2 had ended national-socialist fascism -  sex should not in any sense infringe on your Human Rights equality.

Moreover, due to a break in religious brain-washing in the "West", the "developed world" managed to modernize its view on women to an extent that made it possible for women to show off their bodies in public. Moreover, and most importantly, this development also revealed that the absolute majority of healthy men had no problem whatsoever with it. Men can - if you just stop trying to eat the cake while still having it!

However, even the progressive West has been too slow to adapt to full equality between the sexes. And a main tool for this has been religion. And of all religions it is now sharia islam that is the worst threat when it comes to full Human Rights for girls/women.

Interestingly, now a mainly Atheist country, China, asks for more sex segregation to "cure effeminacy" in the form of encouraging more "masculinity" among Chinese boys to better compete with Silicon Valley and Wall Street. Klevius wonders whether that would imply that lack of religion made Chinese men more "effeminate" than their religious counterparts in the "West"?


Bigoted and deeply hypocritical (or just racist and Human Righsphobic) muslim sharia women enjoy the West's Human Rights freedom while islam ravages their sisters in muslim countries and muslim sharia ghettos in the West.

When women say they "enjoy sex"* they don't mean the same as men - because of sex segregation

* Either as pure "rub sex" or "romantic sex" which isn't really about sex at all.

Klevius remembers how he as a teenager got aware of the depth of segregation between the sexes when he managed to get the interest of the "beauty queen" at a club and much later that same night heard her saying that it had been such a good time for her to be with someone who didn't try to push her in bed.

* Male dogs don't bother about "romantic relations", fore play etc. - that's why we call it "dog sex". However, due to sex segregation, i.e. that girls and boys are alienated from each other, heterosexual attraction has become a main means for girls/women to get attention from boys/men - and for boys/men to excuse (and be excused about) promisquous sexism. This alienation occurs despite boys and girls intermingle.


Six bio/logical facts about sex

1  Heterosexual attraction isn't sex per se.
2  Heterosexual men can have sex without heterosexual attraction.
3  Homosexual men can have both homosex and heterosex.
4  There are no heterosexual women.
5  "Rub sex" is "dog sex" for both males and females.
6  The only reason for "changing sex" is sex segregation.

Klevius will explain these crucial points more in detail later.


Men can actually treat women as human beings - but can all women handle that?


Klevius knows because he's a man with at the least average amount of male hormones and with a history that lacks 1) rapetivist behavior and 2) lacks any occasion of "failure" when being invited by women into sexual acting (not even his wives/girlfriends can complain about that)*. Moreover, for Klevius the problem has rather been the very opposite, namely that women seem to expect being treated as "women", while Klevius insists on treating them as equal human beings.

* These strange remarks by Klevius are made just to avoid readers who don't know Klevius to dismiss him as someone living in celibacy (or something else) and therefore being less informed in these issues.

In the early 1990s Klevius wrote an academic thesis called Gender Apartheid at the Socialanthropology department of Stockholm University. It was however dismissed (and Klevius refused to change it) with the following words: "You are very intelligent, logical and coherent in your writing and in your use of citations. However, the thesis is not written in a way that is expected on this institution" (an approximate translation from Swedish).


Klevius wrote:

Friday, April 18, 2014

Gender schizophrenia


Covering up the world's biggest problem (sex segregation/apartheid) in gender babble - but when will the bubble burst?

 Oxford Dictionaries definition of 'gender': The state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).

However this kind of non sense use of 'gender' is more and more common:


Of course there are no 'gender-bending' insects. If a female insect possesses an organ that can pick up semen from a cavity in a male insect, that has nothing to do with gender at all.



Klevius clarification for his dear but sometimes mildly confused readers:

John Money introduced the distinction between biological sex and gender in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories. However. In the 1970s feminists embraced the concept as a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. Today, the distinction is strictly followed in some contexts, especially the social sciences and documents written by the WHO. In many other contexts, however, even in some areas of social sciences, the meaning of gender has undergone a usage shift to include sex or even to replace it. This gradual change in the meaning of gender can be traced to the 1980s. The APA's psychoanalytically contaminated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual first described the condition in the third publication ("DSM-III") in 1980 and this was then followec by the so called 'glamour feminism' which has ever since trapped girls/women in a continuing web of cultural 'femininity' that functions as a barrier against those ("tomboys") who dare to try to escape it - leaving no other options than either to conform or to become a so called "transsexual". Why do people have to alter their biology when we have Human Rights that should give everyone the right to live as s/he wishes without restrictions imposed because of one's sex?

It's also noteworthy that the pathological pathologizing of a girl's wish to be free from sex related constrains (a freedom guaranteed adult women in the Human Rights declaration) is a violation of Human Rights but is made possible because minors (and their parents/custodians other than the state) have no legal say (compare what is said in Klevius' thesis Pathological Symbiosis).

It's still an open question how much this disastrous and monstrous sex apartheid has helped islam (the worst crime ever against humanity) to exist among civilized people (compare what Klevius wrote in Rapetivism from Freud to bin Laden more than a decade ago). Evil and Human Rights violating islamic tenets that would have been completely unthinkable two decades ago are now defended!


 Thanks to a scholarship in 1885, Freud visited his main idol, Jean Charcot, "the Napoleon of Neuroses" and known as "the greatest neurologist of his time" (H. Ellenberger 1970:89), here giving a fake lecture on "hysteria in women" at his institute.(a former poor house for women) in Paris where he attempted to establish a medical monopoly over hypnosis based on contemporary ideas on sex segregation. When Freud returned to Vienna he made his living by "treating" wealthy "hysteric" women. (see Klevius' Psycho Timeline). It is an irony that most of the women performing "hysteria" at Charcot's institute were from the lower classes, in sharp contrast to those women who then became treated by his former students. Who are the great fakes of our time?Psychotimeline revealing Freud's misogyny

 

This is the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani who is now the Fuhrer over all the world's muslims' world organization, Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Sharia. 



and his disciples

 
 Klevius feels really privileged to be the only one (so far) truly addressing the world's biggest question. However, Klevius is also disturbingly aware of the fact that his time as the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (due to no competition) may be over in no time at all when the global female prison finally opens its gates.

Tuesday, October 03, 2017

Klevius teenage son says capitalism is dead - tomorrow.


Klevius teenage son proposes removing money all together and make everything free. AI/robotics will make this inevitable anyway - and Klevius doesn't know what to say. Do you?


A world where everything is free - and protected by the anti-fascist negative* Human Rights.

* Read Klevius definition of the negative Human Rights, i.e. the very basic rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration from 1948 on which United Nations was supposed to stand on and for.

Already at the mature age of 12 he replaced Dad with Richard Stallman as his main hero after having been pissed off by the behavior of Apple and Microsoft and their use of the patent-license-copyright* system.

* Do note that much of the "secret" of Japanese high tech production quality stems from a system that historically has been the very opposite to the American one. Much of the US economy today relies on lawyers sucking out whatever there is to get money from patents/copyrights/licenses while thereby also counteracting the interest of the consumers.  

As a model for his idea about a free world he used Ubuntu, a free software based on the American, Richard Stallman's GNU project and the Finland-Swede Linus Torvald's invention LINUX (which now runs all the world's fastest supercomputers).

Free software is free as in freedom - not as in free beer - and isn't locked down by a proprietor - meaning freedom to use, modify and share.

We live in a much faster moving world today due to globalization and automation. This means e.g. that politicians may have problem keeping up.

Here the example of globalization/technologization of Africa.

How technology is freeing Africa from 1,400 years of islamic enslavement and genocides.


Poor education, over population and corruption have cursed Africa due to imposed religious abuse.

However, in almost no-time in the 1990s Finland (Nokia) and Sweden (L M Ericson) participated with Africans who freed themselves from the costly task of building an all covering land-line infra-structure. Today China is participating with Africans in a way that is fast making the continent no different from other continents. Only problem being religion/sex apartheid which causes half of the population being busy producing too many children. However, even this will stop in the long run when all African girls get rid of their sex segregated hand cuffs.

This shows have technology can transform and adapt in ways that are both more cost efficient and far more quicker than conventional low grade automation.

In the late 1970s Klevius wrote an article called Automation and basic income. Although it was never approved of being published (still wonder why) it foresaw that automation (digitalization) of processes would anyway inevitably lead to a point where no person was needed for production and administration.

However, what Klevius missed was what a young fresh mind today could see, namely that automation would also make capitalism redundant. Is this what Xi Jinping is at? State controlled freedom during a transitional stage led by heavily supported AI/robotics Rn'D. A state steered dagger given to capitalism for the purpose of committing suicide.

Japanese robots manufactured robots already in the 1980s. And when Klevius used his laptop 18 years ago in San Francisco for making phone calls for free via Skype (thanks to a young Swedish inventor) and to sell and buy shares online, he realized that the robots had already taken over.

We know that everything can be automated just as our brain/Thalamus automates our dealings with our internal and external worlds - see Klevius groundbreaking  EMAH theory (1992/1994 and on the web 2004)) which exactly explains what "consciousness" is - and is not.

AI/robotics or automation, call it what you like, can easily produce better CEO's than the existing ones - not to mention board members.

However, they can therefore also produce usefulness within sustainable profit margins.

A new financial/productive system is born - and we need only to keep the vultures away from it during a transition time.

And then capitalism is dead.

Negative rights for a positive future


Sharia restricts Human Rights and promotes supremacism (drawing 1979 and photo 2012 by P. Klevius).

A free world can only exist under so called negative Human Rights, i.e. rights without content* and therefore immunized against impositional** (positive) "rights". Freedom rights instead of so called "Stalin rights", as some of the agreed rights came to be called when they emanated from the USSR system.

Negative rights can be exemplified with traffic rules. Every participant has exactly the same rights - no matter what s/he drives or if s/he doesn't drive at all.

And limitations necessary to keep it going affect everyone equally.

* I.e. a protected sphere that the individual may fill with whatever - as long as it doesn't clash with the rights of others.

** In traffic as in democracy limitations should only be accepted if necessary in a free system.

Friday, September 29, 2017

Not a word from BBC today about soon a million cholera victims due to Saudi war crimes in Yemen - but instead a lot about Saudi backed Rohyngias whose jihad campaign against Buddhists then is blamed on - Buddhists.


While BBC worries about cholera among Rohyngia muslims and blaiming the Buddhists who were victimized by Saudi supported Rohyngia muslim attacks, BBC completely "forgets" to also mention that the same Saudis by their attacks on neighboring Yemeni people have managed to produce the world's worst cholera epidemic - much bigger than the total of Rohyngia "refugees"*.


* As always with islam it's the evil original "islamist" part of islam that then causes the suffering for those who have been forced into the religion by birth and apostasy ban.



The former Saudi backed "president" of Yemen, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi was "elected" as the only candidate and later ousted by Yemen's biggest party, his own The General People's Congress, an Arab nationalist movement.

So blaming everything on Iran and nothing on the islamofascist Saudi dictator family isn't true at all. Moreover, almost half of the Yemeni muslims are shia.

Finally, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the certain road to continuing suffering while better cooperation with Iran could open up for a real solution of Mideast while securing the existence of Israel in the same way as securing the nuclear deal. But the main problem is the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its position as "the custodians of islam" which they use ruthlessly for their own power-mad islamic hate mongering.

Opening up for Iran would also help puncturing the Iranian islamic theocracy and thereby paving the way for the true will of the Iranian people who already possess a sort of democracy that the Saudi dictatorship isn't even close to.


Britisharia may as well be called Saudisharia


The "British" opting for Saudi islamist sharia (via finance, weapons trade etc) in effect means abandoning the most basic rights of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration the world 1948 adopted after having fought against fascism in WW2.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

BBC has now reached as far to the bottom it gets from the highest principles of journalism and ethical values, in its appalling defense of the worst evil on Earth.


When the islamofascist Saudi dictator family finally is forced to let women drive, BBC praises the medieval theocratic dictatorship while blaming "conservative clerics" - and ends with a visit to a Mussolini museum in Italy! 

How convenient... No matter how much evidence is presented about the Saudis - crimes against humanity, it's all blinked. And blaiming the clerics is complete nonsense because islam is the only power the Saudis have - and they do know that being "custodians of islam" is their palace fence - i.e. keeping all the world's muslims hostage for the sake of a greedy war crime committing family living on Western oil aid.

The Saudis use islam exactly as it was used from its origin, namely to get power for free by stealing and enslaving and then use the ideology against its critics.

BBC insidiously tried to make its ignorant listeners to see the evil Saudi islamofascists in a positive light while simultaneously "reminding" its listeners that fascism started in Italy - and therefore has nothing to do with islam.

Well, nothing could be more faked and misleading. Islamofascism IS the fascism of today and the Saudi dictator family is its main custodian.

The Saudis hide their terrorist links precisely by being the last medieval theocratic dictator "monarchy" and BBC happily repeats the lie: "The official (sic) Saudi state doesn't support terrorism".

Moreover, and possibly even more importantly, except for Saudi sponsored Sunni terrorism around the world, the Saudi based and steered OIC is an evil "peaceful" tool for violating basic Human Rights by replacing them with sharia. In other words, trampling Human Rights by referring to islam as a religion.

Most people on these pics weren't evil - however, evil resided in the ideology targeting the evil ones, with the power of the mass of "moderates".

BBC also tries to give its compulsory fee paying listeners the impression that it's the demented Saudi dictator's (called "king" instead of dictator by BBC) son who should be credited, when, in fact, he is if possibly even more conservative - albeit under hard pressure from Klevius and others, and therefore throws this bone away to keep the wolves busy for a while while he is continuing his genocides in the region and islamic hate mongering and intolerance all over the world.

[Ironically] Montfermeil will soon begin the construction of a mosque with a minaret 12 meters high. According to Lemoine, he yielded to the pressure and granted the building permit in order to combat the shortage of "muslim places of worship" (why do muslims need to pray so much). He hopes that the prayers and cultural activities offered will calm the spirits; but he has no illusions. “It’s a struggle between two cultures,” he sighs. “It’s a war between islam and Western culture (no, it's a war between islamofascism and Human Rights). France and all of Europe are in danger. If we refuse to see the extent of the Muslim threat, we are gravely at risk.

Will the Saudi hate mongering against Shia muslims and others get even worse after Mrs. Theresa May's Britisharia Brexit?



Islam is the most hateful, racist, sexist and divisive faith? So being an "important ally" with the worst Sunni bully (the islamofascist* Saudi dictator family) while spitting on Shia Iran, is as bigoted, hypocritical and dangerously divisive as it possibly gets.

* No matter how much oil money the Saudis spend on bribing the world, the only asset they have is their use of being "the guaridian of islam" and therefore also relying on the use of original islam, i.e. Wahhabism/Salafism. Without this they would fall immediate pray to "moderate islam" and vanishing into a "moderate modern" monarchy.



Human Rights Watch found that the incitement, along with anti-Shia bias in the criminal justice system and the Education Ministry’s religion curriculum, is instrumental in enforcing discrimination against Saudi Shia citizens. Human Rights Watch recently documented derogatory references to other religious affiliations, including Judaism, Christianity, and Sufi Islam in the country’s religious education curriculum.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

Why are Human Rights defenders demonized - and why do we let an islamofascist dictator "country" (smaller than Netherlands) threaten the whole world's safety and peace and continue spreading hate and intolerance?


A fascist medieval type dictator "monarchy" created by Theresa May's predecessors is now the worst enemy of people around the world.


The Saudi islamofascists do exactly as the Islamic State - teaching hate to be randomly exchanged to terror against random individuals worldwide.



Today again BBC's house sharia islamist (and the "expert" Mrs May asked to check Human Rights violating sharia "courts" in England) Mona Saddiqi continued her plattitudes repeatedly trumpeted from BBC's minarets over compulsory fee paying ignorant English "kaffirs": "It's a mystery why Allah allows evil".

Klevius (who is a real expert* on islam - i.e. not an islamist): You're very wrong Mona. It's not a "mystery" at all. As Klevius has repeatedly informed since 9/11, "Allah" was deliberately cut out ("Allah willing") from original islam for the very purpose of giving room for human evil like racist booty jihad attacking, looting and murdering/raping "kaffirs", enslaving, ethnic cleansing, genocides, sex slavery etc. (read the history of the emergence of islam - starting e.g. with Hugh Kennedy and K. S. Lal, and continuing e.g. with Ohlig/Puin's The Hidden Origins of Islam, and Fernandez-Morena's The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, if you are so dumb so you don't trust Klevius).

* Only an Atheist relying on the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 can be a true expert on islam.

And when Theresa May says "islam's a great and peaceful religion" it only covers a version of islam based on wishful (or just deliberately lying) Western thinking while neglecting islam's evil allure, apostasy ban, and extremely appalling history.

If true islam would really be as Mrs May allegedes (but compare her "best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's  Wahhabi/Salafiislam), then islam would be dead in no time - except as a laughable creed for morally confused social outliers - i.e. those very muslim extremists who belive her nice words about islam and who then check up on the most original islam, and how the "custodians of islam" and other experts on islam tell them to go for the original rather than "Westernized islam".

Islam can never stand up to the high standards of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Sorry muslims if this "offends" and/or "demonizes" you. You then need a mirror.

And if you don't believe Klevius, then check with islam's most powerful world organization, Saudi based and steered O.I.C. which has openly declared that islam can't tolerate Human Rights (epecially not for girls/women and other "kaffirs") and therefore has Human Rights violating sharia (called islamic "human rights" so to sound better in U.N. etc. presentations).

This is also why/how the worst Human Rights violator and spreader of islamic hate all over the planet, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family sits on U.N. Human Rights council. I.e. supposedly the very bastion for anti-fascism has been occupied by - islamofascists clad in oil money.

Last but not least. This isn't Klevius' "Saudiphobia" or "islamophobia". That the islamofascist Saudi dictator family has been the worst and most intolerant spreader of islamic hate over the world is well known and repeatedly confirmed in most quarters.

So why has Klevius to rant about it so loudly? Because most people are afraid of being labelled "islamophobes" by Theresa May and other similar politicians etc. It's a fascistoid demonization of Human Rights defenders for the sole purpose of protecting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

And because most media are faked and corrupted by the fear of "islamophobia" - with the biggest one also being the worst, namely BBC.

And only when Trump was forced to lick the islamofascist Saudi ass did he get a slight ceasefire, sort of, by the media. However, that move made him also sink into that very swamp he promised to drain.

However, part of this may also be blamed on his naivety about the real financial state of the country he planned to steer.

Perhaps he didn't fully understand terms such as 'Seven Sisters', 'petro-dollar', 'gold standard', 'printing money', 'Sino-Russia cooperation' etc.

Trump himself was steered away from Russia because of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. A tiny country same size or smaller than e.g. Netherlands. How come?

Two almost similar sized countries (Saudi population may even be smaller as some half of it consists of immigrants who are mostly more or less slave workers - only a minority consists of well educated experts).

Most of the Saudi population live in ten cities - making the populated country area also less than Netherlands.


Saudi medieval theocratic dictatorship

GDP (official exchange rate):
$639.6 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
1.4% (2016 est.)
4.1% (2015 est.)
3.7% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 161
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$55,200 (2016 est.)
$55,700 (2015 est.)
$53,900 (2014 est.)


Netherlands modern democratic monarchy

GDP (official exchange rate):
$771.2 billion (2016 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
2.1% (2016 est.)
2% (2015 est.)
1.4% (2014 est.)
country comparison to the world: 129
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$51,000 (2016 est.)
$50,300 (2015 est.)
$49,500 (2014 est.)

The open secret of how the evil Saudi dictator family manages to bully the world: Islamofascism (custodians of islam) and the two Os (OPEC and OIC).


Sitting on easily (i.e. cheaply) extractable oil/gas and helped by US exploiters the islamofascist Saudi dictator family managed to heavily influence OPEC so that in 1973 they caused the so called energy crisis and 1974 they collected a ransom deal with US resulting in the so called petro dollar as well as even more influence to the Saudis under the cover of mighty America.

Soon the islamofascist Saudi dictator family started utilizing the many tensions/problems (caused by islam in the first place) in muslim (or partially muslim) countries. For this purpose they established OIC which became the biggest single pressure block in U.N. Via OIC's sharia declaration the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also avoided UN criticism of its appalling Human Rights record, by simply introducing OIC's sharia as "islamic human rights".


The biggest meddler in US politics is the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


It's likely that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family also threatened the US with leaving the US dollar in its oil "sale" (oil from stolen/occupied land).

As with its "cooperation" with Israel (although no Jews really tolerated in islamic Saudi Arabia) the "cooperation" with the US is just to get allies against its main rival Iran who in turn is backed by Russia - therefore the enormous noise in Washington.

And of course there has evolved many personal ties to the "kaffirs" in the West, but these are just based on money and influence - and the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's wish to leave as Westerners while spitting on them via islam, hence boosting the picture that islam is anti West, hence also boosting inferiority and hate complex among muslims.

9/11 made it painfully obvious that the main evil of the world today is the undemocratic, Human Rights violating islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Yet the US chose to hug its worst enemy.

So today the tiny oil wealthy Saudi gang has managed to create a dangerous state of a new cold war where it holds the world's muslims hostage for its own sake and the US threatens everyone who the Saudis don't like.

But the world could end this evil cancer in no time if voters in democratic countries would stop voting for any politician positive to the evils of the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi medieval dictator "monarchy".

Persia is probably still waiting for revenge after 1400 years. Is that what Trump had in mind when he applauded Iranians while codemning their muslim leaders?


Klevius wrote:


Friday, May 26, 2017


Will the islamofascist Saud dictator family attack England again during Ramadan?


Klevius question to Theresa May: Do Saudi Salafist values comply with "British values"? And if not, is it really good for England to threaten Russia, which has never attacked England, while having one's worst enemy source, Saudi, as a "close ally"?! Has Klevius missed something...





If you dislike Nazi ideology then you easily qualify for disliking Saudi ideology as well.

Could anything be more worthy of disliking than a bunch of multi billionaire Salafi sharia muslims who use their oil wealth for gaining even more power by bombing their neighbors and spreading islamic hatred over innocent people around the world in a stealthy manner so to be able to "excuse" themselves by saying "it wasn't me who did the bomb or handled the knife, gun, acid, car/truck etc".

Trump lost all respect when he turned from a harsh Saudi critic to an eager supporter of Saudi state (i.e. dictator) terrorism via more or less stealthy channels - hidden behind the very fact that it's a medieval dictatorship.  In other words and as  so much else in the "islamic world", evil covers even more evil.

At least, Theresa May has been consequent in her love affair with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And why wouldn't she. After all, she shares the Saudi view that "sharia is good for the Brits". Only Klevius wonders: Which Brits - the sharia muslim "Brits"? And what about the non sharia English people who respect universal Human Rights equality instead of Human Rights violating sharia? England is a modern sovereign state, "Britain" is a pompous and dangerous colonialist nostalgia term in which sharia "diversity" hides its ugly face.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the core tumor of the cancer spreading from Mideast. Giving additional nutrition to cancer cells is not an acceptable strategy.

No young jihadi mind will ever believe that he's completely off the target as long as the "custodians of islam" preach the same hatred and are respected by politicians like Theresa May and Donald Trump.

The monetary stakes are admittedly high but nothing compared to the Saudi Human Rights violations and its costs. May's and Trump's Saudi politics is just "creative book keeping" and a cynical disrespect for the security of innocent people.



The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the core problem. And Theresa May's Brexit startegy of escape into old colonial "British" paths is hardly helpful.


As the Saudi "custodians of islam" having the same Sunni Salafi (i.e. original islam) ideology as the muslim terrorists, that alone should be enough reason to vote out any politician who supports Saudi islamofascism.

However, there's also a much larger problem with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. That's the Saudi based and steered OIC which "peacefully" promotes Salafi sharia hate all over the world. And with the help of mainly muslim countries OIC has managed to make Saudi islamofascism "ok" via UN by accepting that sharia can be whatever - even islamofascist Saudi Salafist Wahhabism. 

Klevius has noted that his hits go down when he writes about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. How come?


How England as a "British" colonizer created the worst evilon the planet. Of course they weren't aware back then about the monetary effects of oil that would then later multiply this evil.

Does the islamofascist Saudi dictator family already possess more nuke missiles than Israel?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family funded the Pakistani nuke program and has extremely tight connections with Pakistan re. nuke technology.

Klevius suggestion: Israel's fooling around with the Saudis doesn't promise any good for the region - or for Israel itself. So the best thing an Iranian president could do now is partnering with Israel...



* Saudi King Abdul Aziz Ibn SaudIn 1901, Twenty-one-year-old Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman Al-Saud left Kuwait, determined to fight along-side the British forces against the Islamic state in order to get power over all of the territory once occupied by his pirate forefathers and to extend his occupation over the holy cities of Makkah and Medinah.

In 1902, The Exiled Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman Al-Saud and his gangsters (the Wahhabi movement) stormed Riyadh and shot and killed the Wali (the governor of the Khilafah:Aal-Rasheed) as another gift for Britain. This event marked the beginning of the formation of the pirate kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

1902-1913, After establishing Riyadh as his headquarters, Abdul Aziz proceeded, over the following decades side to side with the British soldiers to loot and kill the soldiers and supporters of The Ottomani Khilafah and he succeeded in many cities.

In 1914, Britain started to send a stream of agents (including William H.Shakespeare, Harry St. John Phil by and Percy Cox) to woo and encourage Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman in her task on the Arabian front. Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman’s campaign was one of sabotage and stabbing in the back, it was never face-to-face confrontation.

In 1915, Britain dispatched an agent by the name of William H. Shakespeare as a close advisor to Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman. The soldiers of the Khaleefah killed William alongside some Wahhabi conspirators.

In 1915, Britain dispatched another agent by the name of Harry St. John Philby, who soon appeared in full Arab dress on top of a camel with Abdul- Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as a saudi warrior. Philby was called by Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman the “new star of Arab firmament”. Philby in return described Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman as the Arabs “man of destiny” however Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman was the arch political sell-out, many times offering to sell himself to the British. He once said to Philby, “If anyone offered me a million pounds I would give him all the concessions he wants”.

In December 1915 the Anglo-Saud friendship treaty was concluded. This treaty made the house of Saud an outpost of the British Empire. Britain was given trading privileges and was superintendent of Saudi foreign policy. A guarantee of British military protection and arms supplies ended the Khaleefah’s authority in central Arabia.

In 1916, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman received from the British 1300 guns, 10,000 rupees and 20,000 pieces of gold in cash.

1917-1926, Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman and his organised Wahhabi gangsters in military style and with the help of the British soldiers succeeded in controlling the Whole of Arabia i.e. Najd and Hijaz.

In On 8 January 1926 Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman ( Known as Ibn-Saud) was self-proclaimed king of Arabia. King Abdul-Aziz was embroiled in discussions with the British representative, Percy Cox, for the determination of the borders of the new entity. The British Public Records described king Abdul-Aziz’s demeaning stature at these meetings “like a naughty schoolboy” in front of Cox. When Cox insisted it was his decision as to the frontiers between Kuwait, “Ibn-Saud almost broke down and pathetically remarked that Sir Percy was like his father and mother who made him and raised him from nothing… and he would surrender half his Kingdom, nay the whole, if Sir Percy ordered. Cox took out a map and pencil and drew a line of the frontier of Arabia”. Surely no Muslim can ever read such a statement except with abject shame at the way the sacred sites of Makkah and Medinah and the land of Hijaaz were put in the hands of a family with such debased and dishonorable pedigree.

1926-1932, King Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman (Ibn-Saud) courted the British unashamedly, showing sublime affection towards Britain’s envoys. He offered to put Arabia under their control. For his loyalty to the British crown, like so many other British agents, Ibn Saud was awarded a knighthood (presented to him by his self-proclaimed “father and mother” Percy Cox) and British

documents referred to him as “Sir” Abdul Aziz Bin Saud for many years afterwards.

In On September 23, 1932 the self appointed king, Sir Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman replaced the names of Najd and Hijaaz by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and he laid the foundations of the current Pirate state.

Eisenhower and Nixon at Dinner with King SaudIn 1953, The pirate king Abdul-Aziz Bin Abdul-Rahman died.

In 1953, Saud the eldest son of Abdul Aziz Succeeded the throne upon his father’s death and became king.

In 1957, King Saud made the first trip by a Saudi monarch to the United States.

In 1962, Saudi Arabia by special request of the British government sponsored an international Islamic conference, which fostered the Muslim World League, which has its headquarters in Makkah.

In 1964, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz died.

In 1964, Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz became king.

King faisal Bin Abdul AzizIn 1971, King Faisal by special request of the British government was a central force behind the establishment of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (the OIC) in Jeddah.

In 1975, King Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz was killed by his brother Fahd (The Who Became the king Afterwards).

King Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz. aIn 1975, Khalid Bin Abdul Aziz became king.

In 1982, King Khalid was poisoned by his brother Fahd .

In 1982, Fahd became king.

King Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz.1982-2005,  King Fahd Bin Abdul-Aziz is the pirate ruler of the pirate state of so-called Saudi-Arabia.

2005 – 2014 Until Today King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz is the Pirate Ruler King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saudof the British Sponsored State of the So Called Saudi Arabia .

The “Royal Family” of Saudi Arabia is the leading champion of all efforts to silence Islam, and to wipe out and demolish its identity. Najd and Hijaaz were the former names of so-called Saudi Arabia today. As everybody knows, Makkah and Madinah are Islam’s place of birth. Makkah houses “Al-Haram Al- Sharif”, and Madinah houses “Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi”, these are known as the “Two Holy Mosques”. The darker history of Hijaaz started with the ruthless, coward, savage and murdering Abdul-Aziz Bin Saud, who established himself as King back in 1932.

With the help of the British, King Abdul-Aziz replaced the country’s name of Hijaaz with Saudi Arabia which is the only country in the world that is named after its Dictator. King Abdul Aziz sexually abused many women, he now has more than 44 known sons and lots of known and unknown daughters. This dark history continues with the so-called “royal family”, and their leader King Fahd, the so-called “Guardian” whose title should be, “The Robber of the two Holy Mosques”, from the Arabic Expression: ” Ha-miha..Ha-ramiha “, which means ” Its Protector is really Its Robber “.










Wednesday, September 20, 2017

The English cherry picking neo-con fruit cake lady Mrs. May aspiring for a neo-"British empire"-colonialism


Mrs Theresa May's secret agenda to protect her islamofascist Saudi friends/"allies" by muffling "islamophobia"/"Saudiphobia" and by calling criticism and the defense of the most basic Human Rights "extremism"?


Theresa May denies suppressing report into Saudi Arabia’s funding of UK islamist extremism to protect arms deals.


Mrs Theresa May: “There is certain confidential information in the report which means it would not be appropriate to publish it.”

Klevius: If this extremist report had been about Iran, Russia or China, it would have been published in full and available on every possible social media - without Mrs. May asking to suppress it.

And whom are we talking about? The last remaining true dictator "monarchy", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who use a Medieval religious hate ideology for its own benefits and the murdering, raping and terrorizing of others - not to mention its poisonous effects all over the world in different institutions and among politicians.

BBC and her neo-cons seem to be much more concerned about peaceful China than the islamic hate mongering islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

But China lacks completely such a hate ideology (Maoism* is dead) and therefore has to rest on peaceful manufacturing and investment of surplus from this manufacturing, which by now constitutes the by far most important worldwide empoverment of previously underdeveloped communities. I.e. something quite different from May's and Trump's aggressive weapons waiving/selling, combined with aiding Saudi islamofascist aggressions in Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Iraq, Myanmar etc. etc.

* Islamism has caused way more victims throughout 1,400 years than short lived Maoism ever managed to do.

Here's a muslim view on Theresa May:


However, do notice the extremely (sorry about that) different ideological basis when comparing Klevius to muslims. Whereas the muslim ideology is rooted in disgusting "conquests" (i.e. attacks on innocent people called "kaffirs"), looting, raping, murdering and enslaving (read history, e.g. Hugh Kennedy), Klevius ideology is rooted in U.N.'s anti-fascist Human Rights declaration of 1948.



Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

UK PM escaping when "the best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family attacks the Parliament.

Why is she continuing dealing with and supporting the worst spreaders of hate and evil?

Islam's "custodians", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (together with Saudi based and steered OIC) constitutes the heart of evil islam in today's world. So why an "ally"?



The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is said to be the world's largest source of funds and promoter of Salafist muslim jihadism, which forms the ideological basis of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and others. Moreover, donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.

The violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is partly bankrolled by wealthy donors from the Arabian peninsula whose "governments" support them. Three other muslim Arab countries which are listed as sources of militant money are Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, all neighbors of Saudi Arabia. Taliban and their militant partners the Haqqani network earn "significant funds" through UAE-based businesses. Kuwait is described as a "source of funds and a key transit point" for al-Qaida and other militant groups. The Pakistani militant muslim outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front company to fund its activities in 2005. According to studies, most of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis. 15 of the 19 muslim hijackers of the four airliners who were responsible for 9/11 originated from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Osama bin Laden was raised in Saudi Arabia - just like BBC's sharia presenter Mishal Husain btw.

Starting in the mid-1970s the islamic resurgence was funded by an abundance of money from Saudi Arabian oil exports. The tens of billions of dollars in "petro-islam" largess obtained from the recently heightened price of oil funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith."

Throughout the Sunni Muslim world, religious institutions for people both young and old, from children's maddrassas to high-level scholarships received Saudi funding, "books, scholarships, fellowships, and mosques" (for example, "more than 1500 mosques were built and paid for with money obtained from public Saudi funds over the last 50 years"), along with training in the Kingdom for the preachers and teachers who went on to teach and work at these universities, schools, mosques, etc.[108] The funding was also used to reward journalists and academics who protected the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its spread of hate; and satellite campuses were built around Egypt for Al Azhar, the world's oldest and most influential islamic university.

Saudi-based Wahhabism or Salafism preaches that (Sunni) muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way," but "hate them for their religion ... for Allah's sake," that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century," that Shia and other "wrong-muslims" were "infidels", etc. According to former Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew, while this effort has by no means converted all, or even most, muslims to the Saudi Wahhabist islam, it has done much to overwhelm more moderate local interpretations of islam in Southeast Asia, and to pitch the Saudi-interpretation of islam as the "gold standard" of religion in minds of muslims across the globe.

Patrick Cockburn accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting extremist islamist groups in the Syrian Civil War, writing: "In Syria, in early 2015, it (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family) supported the creation of the Army of Conquest, primarily made up of the al-Qaeda affiliate the al-Nusra Front and the ideologically similar Ahrar al-Sham, which won a series of victories against the Syrian Army in Idlib province."

While the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's "government" denies claims that it exports religious or cultural extremism, it is argued that by its nature, Wahhabism encourages intolerance and promotes terrorism. Former CIA director James Woolsey described it as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are flourishing." In 2015, Sigmar Gabriel, Vice-Chancellor of Germany, accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting intolerance and extremism, saying: "Wahhabi mosques are financed all over the world by Saudi Arabia (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family). In Germany, many dangerous islamists come from these communities." In May 2016, The New York Times editorialised that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family allied to the U.S. had "spent untold millions promoting Wahhabism, the radical form of Sunni islam that inspired the 9/11 hijackers and that now inflames the islamic State".




Klevius additional comment: The pattern seems familiar when compared to the original aggression of islam in cooperation with (some) Jews*. Just take a look at the Jewiah-islamic relations by checking out e.g. the myth of "the Andalusian paradise", or the twisted life of Maimonides (you know, the "great Jewish thinker" who only survived islam by pretending to be a muslim).

* Today Jews who are critical to islamic Human Rights violations are forbidden by Theresa May from entering UK (e.g. Pamela Geller) while Jews who are supportive of the Saudi cause are welcomed and honored.

Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 05, 2015


The Jewish origin of islam


Islam is a sect grown out of Judaism via Christianity.


According to Human Rights there are no "chosen people". Meaning that you may believe whatever you like as long as you follow legislation guided by the principle of Universal equality.

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.


And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Theocrats: More RE! Klevius: More HRE (Human Rights education)! How can children possibly understand the evil of "religion" if they don't understand Human Rights?


Islam teaches that no "innocent" people should be killed. Islam also teaches that non-muslim 'kafirs' are sinners - i.e. not "innocent".



 What causes islamic "extremism"? Klevius answer: Uncritical islamophilia and Mohammadophilia.

"Diversity" (i.e. islampphilia) is the most fertile ground for islamofascism - and ought not to be conflated with 'pluralism' (see Klevius' article Angels of Antichrist) which is based on Human Rights equality.


When society signals with all its horns, not the least to innocent children at school, that "islam is a great religion", then no wonder that youngsters out of curiosity want to know the origin of this wonderful religion. And when they do, no matter if they check the Koran or Mohammad's behavior, or read it from historians such as e.g. Hugh Kennedy, the message is the same and in almost perfect disharmony with what they were taught in school.


So Klevius suggestion is to stop calling islam "a great religion" and instead telling children about islam's evil origin and how islamic sharia is against the most basic Human Rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human  Rights declaration of 1948 (especially the so called 'negative rights').

How close is Theresa May's definition of "extremism" to that of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which is her "important ally".




BBC's debate audience applauded frenetically to muslim mayor of London's platitudes - which no one would even had noticed from a non-muslim mouth. Btw, the muslim mayor of London, Saddiq Khan, previously used to defend hateful supremacist preachers as e.g. the Fuhrer of Nation of Islam, Louis Eugene Wolcott (aka Farra-khan).


Almost equally much as when BBC accused Trump for "not being helpful" when Trump had pointed to the fact that English security often knows about islamists (and even has employed muslim terrorists).



Say "Trump" and the PC audience laugh and hate. Say "muslim" and they love it - no matter what. Clearly RE in England has produced what it was aimed for, i.e. padding "diversity", i.e. the "muslim community", i.e. the muslim Umma nation steered f
rom Saudi Arabia by the "custodians of islam", i.e. by the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi dictator family (which is behind most evil deeds committed by muslims), i.e. by Theresa May's "important ally". This "ally", who has repeatedly attacked England via its hate propaganda and support of islamic jihadi, is then used by the English government as its "security adviser".


Give us a break!

Tendentious BBC fulfills every criterion for being "extremist" if measured against Human Rights.


BBC's hate propaganda against Buddhists is almost the exact opposite to its love propaganda for islam.

BBC, in its extremely onesided and misguiding reporting from Myanmar/Bangladesh, considers muslims "peaceful" - but Buddhists as violent.

And to make this weird equation "work" they eliminate evil terrorist muslims (who follow almost exactly the text in the Koran as well as the deeds of Mohammad) from islam but describe self defending people from Myanmar as "Buddhists" and therefore connected to Buddhism which lack all the evil original islam is contaminated with.

A voice from the web:

Over resent days, islam's political arm in Britain, the BBC and Channel 4, has been awash with stories of all the sufferings that the Rohinga muslim "refugees" have been enduring at the hands of the ""brutal Buddhists". No mention of the fact that the Buddhists have been forced, for nearly 40 years, to defend their country from attacks by Muslims, determined to turn Burma into an Islamic State and destroy Buddhism.

Klevius:  And behind the suffering is the usual culprit, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its hate mongering and support of islamic violent and "peaceful" racist/sexist jihad.

Theresa May's use of the islamic "race card" is appalling - but at least it doesn't point to any muslim whatsoever.

.